JANE JACOBS THE DEATH AND LIFE OF GREAT AMERICAN CITIESJane Jacobs 1961 work The remnant and Life of owing(p) American Cities examines the problems with post-World War II urban planning and argue that cities should embrace optic and kindly motley , moveion , and mixed uses in neighborhoods . She aims her most pointed criticisms at the dark urban renewal projects of the 1950s and `60s , which she argues disrupted neighborhood fabrics and worsened urban conditions instead of improving themQUESTION ONEJacobs argues that great cities require essential looking beyond simply neighborhoods and take a to a greater extent holistic approach , with gum elastic streets clear delineations mingled with cosmos and private spaces , sm every last(predicate) blocks , and get-go-rise buildings from which the sidewalks are easily vis ible(a) . Great urban purlieus literally start with the streets and sidewalks , where populate interact with twain one another throughout the day and the strengthened environment . Vital cities need and should encourage amicable interactions , build a variety of uses (residential and technical should have spaces that allow much(prenominal) interaction ( resembling safe streets and parks , and should embrace a stage of social and visual diversity . She also maintains that cities do not need to be decentralized or redistributed , as planners of the time were doing , and that planners must heed cities social and physical realities quite an than imposing theories . urban renewal projects practically fail because they are too lifesizer-than-life in scale , lack respective(a) amenities (many were mostly commercial projects for example , and were homogeneous spaces where social interaction did not much occur throughout the dayQUESTION TWOForms of social interaction (ot her than those created by state-supported s! paces like social organizations and residential classes support because they unite throng from different backgrounds and neighborhoods , and heathenish organizations help assimilate and include newcomers , who often find urban emotional state isolating and estrange . They need to transcend neighborhood and ethnic boundaries , as Jacobs says , [City] people are mobile .

[and] are not stuck with the provincialism of a neighborhood , any why should they be ? Isn t wide excerpt and rich opportunity the point of cities (Jacobs 116 ) isolation , Jacobs claims , is bad for cities because it contributes more(preno minal)(prenominal) to crime and slum development than low income aloneQUESTION THREEJacobs believes that post-World War II urban planners had good intentions but employ inappropriate methods of dealings with cities , often because they adhered to theories instead of examining cities realities which often contradicted the theories and principles they utilize . In attachment , she claims they had an innate fear and disdain for cities favoring suburbs (much like the federal organisation did , with highway construction and the FHA s suburban twine ) and applying methods to cities that overlooked the conditions requisite for social interaction and public rubber eraser . Planners often embraced urban renewal projects such as high-rise housing projects and large commercial complexes , which failed because their size discouraged smooth monitoring of the sidewalks and streets , did not generate sufficient pedestrian handicraft at all times of day , lacked a proportionateness o f amenities with residences , and promoted more dange! r and less use than...If you hope to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.